Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Technology

Online learning, for me, has been significantly different from in-person learning because of the self-discipline required to succeed.   There is no instructor in your face reminding you that this assignment or that is due.  It is entirely up to you to keep up and keep organized and it is definitely something I wouldn’t have been able to do as effectively when I was younger and a huge procrastinator. 
I think English is a good candidate for online learning because it is one of the less lecture necessary subjects and when the instructor is good, the things that do cause some hassle or confusion can be addressed in person and individually.  I also think that the way discussions are done, with each person being required to post, makes it is easier for everyone to participate, rather than sitting in class and getting only the participation of the few while the quiet ones fade into the background.
As for the technologies we’ve used this semester, most of them were new to me.  I have never blogged before nor have I even heard of using Prezi or Glogster.  I enjoyed the blogging because of how easy it was to use and the continuity it provided.  Everything we posted was right there, easy to find and access.  For the final presentation I did initially try to do a glogster poster but had a difficult time really figuring it out so I tried doing a Prezi instead.  The Prezi interface was easier to figure out and it produced a very cool presentation.  The possibilities I see in creating presentations this way are endless and I foresee using this website and technology in many areas in the future.  Specifically I can see doing school projects and most definitely proposals for clients of my business.  Overall, the use of technology, having to blend it with our writing, links, visuals, blogs, presentations, has been beneficial and required an expansion of thought and skill that I have not previously had to put into a class like this and I am glad we did.


image source:<https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5QmkiDXtYkZbNzRLlYvpK_x6oUMk1Vb3y-K6mUSRt9l2yhOqVeCPuuUT2jsKurijg8nT0UCLk7WituqlGKhqq8P4HDcXBHUFzPnAg5IKJK7XIyzSxB27aIAXAh2Gf0r_BNlQuQaB029M/s1600-r/TechnologyLearning.gif>

Final Presentation

Reflection on the Course

I would have to say the biggest skill I learned in this class was two-fold.  First I learned how to do good close reading.  I learned how to look differently at a piece of literature and pull meaning from it where I used to just read and take the piece I was reading at face-value.  It has become apparently clear that I have missed so much over the years by not knowing or utilizing this skill and look forward to applying it in the future, perhaps even rereading some of the classics I’ve read before.  The second biggest thing I learned was to take that close reading and analyze it.  Asking questions and forming my own opinions as I read.  This is something I never realized I was even capable of but have since been able to apply it in many areas of my reading.
As for the readings in this class, I have come to a very different understanding of monsters.  As I’ve said before, I have come to see and recognize the ways in which monsters are not just creatures that have nothing to do with us but rather they are the ugly parts of us that rise to the surface and find expression when we try to avoid them.  They are our biggest fears and ugliest traits given life and animation.  I originally chose this specific class based on the fact that we would be reading Frankenstein and I am glad I did, I really enjoyed reading it and analyzing it.  I do have to say that I was initially disconcerted to find we would have to also read and write about poetry and I was intimidated by the idea of having to come up with my own ideas about any kind of literature, but I am glad I stuck with it.
Over the course of the semester I have seen my writing process change in terms of organization and planning.  I started with a process that was mostly a think about it and when it comes to me sit and write.  Not much organization at all, but as we progressed in our objectives, so did my process.  By our last essay, I found myself taking notes from the beginning, asking questions about what I was reading and looking for deeper meanings.  By the time I finished reading The Scarlet Letter I already had an idea of what I wanted to write about and was able to sit down and sketch out a rough outline.  After the outline I was able to more effectively search through the secondary sources and find supporting information.  Approaching the writing process this way made it much less stressful to flesh out a workable and supportable paper. 
All in all, this class has been incredibly beneficial to me.  I have learned to look closer at what I’m reading, ask questions and analyze and I have found a happy medium between how I used to write and a more structured method of writing.  While I still consider writing academically, especially using my own opinions, one of my biggest challenges, the processes that we went through and the things we have learned in this class have given me more confidence in my abilities to do what I need to do to produce a good paper.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Critiquing a Critique

I found the zombie article very interesting and informative.  I have honestly never been particularly interested in zombies so I have never given any real thought as to what they might represent.  In this article, which is actually an introduction to his book on zombies, Kyle Bishop, discusses the significance of zombies in general and throughout the periods of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.  I was more than a little surprised at the fact that zombies were never really a part of literature, they did not have their beginnings in books like most other monsters and supernatural creatures.  Bishop talks about how the idea of zombies began in Haitian folklore and transitioned almost immediately to American movies, even as early as the 1920’s.  Even more interesting to me is the evolution of the zombie, especially in relation to the most common fears and anxieties of our culture at any given time.  Bishop details the beginning of the zombie movies, a time  when World War II was a concern as well as slavery.  The  movies of that time all depict themes of racism and reverse slavery and dominance and unwanted invasion, but at the hands of a puppet master.  Through the decades and cultural upheavals and concerns, zombies have taken on different meanings and been depicted in different ways.  Zombies and movies about them have represented themes of war, euthanasia, survivalist instincts, consumerism, terrorism, post-apocalyptic society and more.  Bishop does a great job of breaking down the history of the genre, the monster and the themes and finding the meanings and relationships to our culture throughout.  All in all, this article was very thought provoking and eye-opening and it will, without a doubt make me look at zombies with a more questioning mind from now on.  I can also say that after doing our final project, I have a deeper appreciation for the amount of thought, analysis and research that went into his writing.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Final Essay Draft

April Chaplin
Cline
English 102
10 November 2011
The Power of Guilt in The Scarlet Letter
            The Scarlet Letter was written by Nathaniel Hawthorne in 1850 and is, to this day, considered a piece of classic American literature.  It is a book that for more than a hundred years has yielded numerous interpretations.  It has been analyzed for its historical significance, for the use of symbols and allegory to tell its story, for its religious aspects and as a story about sinners and the different types of sinners it portrays.  All of these interpretations are valid as Millicent Bell, in the opening line of her essay writes;
It is not wrong to identify in this famous short novel the subjects that lie so clearly upon its surface- the effect of concealed and admitted sin, or the opposed conditions of isolation and community, or the antithetic viewpoints of romantic individualism and puritan moral pessimism or the dictates of nature and law (Bell 157).
However, these themes overlook the true message of the book.  It is a story of secrets and guilt and how these powerful forces affect the course, quality and outcome of one’s entire life.  Keeping secrets of tremendous personal magnitude and holding on to all-consuming, unprofessed guilt is a choice that is made by all of the major characters in this book and it is one that is life altering and even fatal. Hawthorne makes clear through the transformations of his characters the devastating effects of secrets.
            The book opens with the Hester Prynne, the first major character of the book,  being brought from the jail and led into the town square. Here she is forced to stand on the scaffold for three hours in front of the entire town wearing a scarlet letter on her chest and holding her newborn baby in her arms.  She is further condemned to wear this elaborately embroidered scarlet letter on her chest, “for the remainder of her natural life” as a “mark of shame” (Hawthorne 63). This is the punishment that the magistrates have deemed fit to enforce on her for the transgression of adultery.  While the story makes clear that this punishment is imposed on Hester for her sin, it is only the beginning of a much deeper picture. 
            Hester’s life throughout the book is colored by the taint of shame and guilt.   She lives with her child, Pearl, and her scarlet letter, both symbols and reminders of her sin, on the fringe of society.  Hawthorne writes;
 In all her intercourse with society, however, there was nothing that made her feel as if she belonged to it.  Every gesture, every word, and even the silence of those with whom she came in contact, implied, and often expressed, that she was banished and as much alone as if she inhabited another sphere…(Hawthorne 84)
What is so important and different about Hester’s guilt is that it is public, it is put out for all to see and it is not denied, even by Hester herself.  Male writes, “Though forced upon her by the community, it is an open recognition of guilt” (Male 101).  It is this open recognition that allows Hester to continue on with her life in the face of shame and eventually find a place in the community.   
            For Arthur Dimmesdale, the town minister, a man whom everyone reveres and believes to be the most righteous man ever to walk the Earth, the experience of guilt is much different.  Because Dimmesdale keeps his guilt a secret and chooses to carry on as though nothing is wrong, he suffers both psychically and physically and is ultimately left vulnerable to the dark and evil machinations of Chillingworth.  Hawthorne illustrates these effects repeatedly.  He writes, “…for it was the clergyman’s peculiarity that he seldom looked straightforth at any object, whether human or inanimate” (Hawthorne 131).  Psychically, he is so guilt ridden that he cannot bear to make eye contact with anyone for fear they may see the darkness and guilt in his soul.  Physically, this young and holy minister deteriorates rapidly and inexplicably.  Hawthorne describes the concern of Dimmesdale’s churchgoers when the minister says he needs no medicine.  They wonder why he would refuse when “with every successive Sabbath, his cheek was paler and thinner, and his voice more tremulous than before…it had now become a constant habit, rather than a casual gesture , to press his hand over his heart” (Hawthorne 122).  This is a glaring example of the effect of secret guilt and the way it will eat a person from the inside out. 
By the end of the story, it is revealed to the reader and to the entire community that Dimmesdale has the mark of the scarlet letter seared in the skin on his chest.  This is the ultimate representation of the power of secret guilt.  As Male describes it, “the letter [is] seen as a psychic cancer that gradually manifested itself physically” (Male 108).  Throughout the book we are shown this destructive power of secrets and guilt through the physical manifestation of one’s psychic maladies.  For Dimmesdale the cost and effect of keeping his guilt a secret is his deteriorating health and the bright light of a brilliant spiritual person that is prevented from attaining its true potential. 
Dimmesdale is not the only person whose secrets and guilt manifest physically.  Chillingworth, the physician charged with caring for Dimmesdale,  holds his own secrets.  He is the husband wronged by Hester and Dimmesdale.  He chooses to never reveal his true identity and instead ingratiate himself with the reverend to carry out a plot of revenge.  He dedicates his life to the mental torture of the one whom he sees as his nemesis.  It is a secret that takes its toll on him in both his mental and physical aspect as well. As the book progresses so does the transformation seen in Chillingworth’s demeanor.   Chillingworth, Hawthorne describes was, “throughout life, [a man] calm in temperament, kindly, though not of warm affections and in all his relations with the world, a pure and upright man” (Hawthorne 129).  By the end of the book the transformation that takes place that is a clear representation of the secret malice that overtakes him.  He is transformed from a “pure and upright man” to one of an evil and grotesquely disfigured countenance.  Hawthorne describes the this shift in chapter fourteen, “In a word, old Roger Chillingworth was a striking evidence of man’s faculty of transforming himself into a devil, if he will only, for a reasonable space of time, undertake a devil’s office” (Hawthorne 170).  Again Hawthorne illustrates and warns against the consequences of keeping secrets.  What is hidden on the inside always finds a way to come out and when it does it is always disastrous.
In the end, as Male states, “Like many great tragedies, The Scarlet Letter deals with the quest for truth, the revelation of secrets” (Male 95).  It is only the revelation of secrets that allows for the transcendence of the guilt that tortures the characters of The Scarlet Letter.  In finally acknowledging and confessing his secret, Dimmesdale is freed to ascend from the agony of his secret guilt that ultimately robbed him of his life, his health and his potential.  For Hester, the revelation of her secret lover and the identity of Roger Chillingworth, finally frees her from the ties that bind her to Boston and allows her for a time to be free.  The only character who does not, in the end, confess his secrets is Chillingworth and the consequences are deadly.  With no one left to inflict his secret methods of torture on, “he positively withered up, shrivelled away, and almost vanished from mortal sight, like an uprooted weed that lies wilting in the sun” (Hawthorne 260) and dies a short time after. 
On the surface, The Scarlet Letter, can be seen as a story about the sin of adultery and how it is dealt with by the various characters of the book.  However, the deeper theme of this book is, in fact, the nature of secrets and guilt and the havoc they can wreak in one’s life.  Brownell writes, “essentially, the book is a story of concealment” (Brownell 58) and adds, “The sin itself might, one may almost say, be almost any other” (Brownell 58).    In reading the novel and looking at the characters individually it is easy to see the truth of this statement because it is not that the sin was adultery or vengeance, it is that the sin was “concealed” that causes the lives of these characters to play out as they do. Had the sin been murder, thievery or anything else, the results would have been the same.  Denying the truth and choosing to keep secrets results in guilt that, given no other outlet, will manifest in destructive and deadly ways.  Ultimately, the moral of this story is, the truth shall set you free.

           
           
           
Works Cited
Bell, Millicent.  “The Obliquity of Signs: The Scarlet Letter.”  Critical Essays on
            Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &
Co., 1988.  157-169.  Print.
Brownell, William Cary.  “Concealment in The Scarlet Letter.”  Critical Essays on
            Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &
            Co., 1988.  58-62.  Print.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. The Centenary Edition of the Works of
            Nathaniel Hawthorne. Volume 1. Ed. William Charavat, et al. Columbus: Ohio
            State University Press, 1962. Print.
Male, Roy R.  “The Tongue of Flame:The Scarlet Letter.”   Critical Essays on
            Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &    Co., 1988.  93-110.  Print.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Annotated Bilbliography

Annotated Bibliography

Bell, Millicent.  “The Obliquity of Signs: The Scarlet Letter.”  Critical Essays on
 Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &
 Co., 1988.  157-169.  Print.

            In this essay the author discusses the “signs” present in The Scarlet Letter.  Several such signs are individually examined in such a way as to show the obliquity, or indirectness of the signs Hawthorne uses in the book.  The author defines several recurring key words such as type, emblem, token and hieroglyph and provides explanations and examples of how they are used and their particular significance to the story.  The author also discusses pairs and the “opposition of outer and inner.”  There is also a brief discussion of the roles of secrets to each of the characters.   In particular I am interested in the opening of this essay which clearly states the many and varying themes of The Scarlet Letter as well as this author’s interpretation of the individual secrets of each of these characters which I hope to use to support my thesis.

Brownell, William Cary.  “Concealment in The Scarlet Letter.”  Critical Essays on
 Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &
 Co., 1988.  58-62.  Print.

            The author in this essay discusses the originality of Hawthorne’s work.  He claims that it is so original because it leaves out the minute details.  It only alludes to and effectively eludes what could be considered by some the subject of the novel, which is illicit love and sin.  He states that it is not about adultery or the sin of it and postulates that the sin could have been anything and the effect would have been the same.  Brownell states rather, that the book is about concealment.  This idea of concealment falls directly in line with my analysis of the book and though he talks about the concealment of sin mostly, there is support in some of his ideas for what my paper will hopefully develop.

Male, Roy R.  “The Tongue of Flame:The Scarlet Letter.”   Critical Essays on
            Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter.  Ed. David B. Kesterson.  Boston: G.K. Hall &    Co., 1988.  93-110.  Print.

            In this essay the author begins by discussing the different interpretations that are most common about The Scarlet Letter.  He talks about the “widespread disagreement among critics” and how that can be seen as a tribute to the genius of the book.  He then begins his interpretation by discussing the importance of Pearl, especially in relation to the other major characters, he outlines the structure of the story then follows with what he believes is the main theme of the book.  He discusses in detail the Tongue of Flame and how it is “the guiding metaphor” of the book.  He also discusses the transformation of the characters in the book through the Light and the Word and the seeking of truth.  Throughout the essay           there are several discussions of guilt and being true to oneself and the consequences of not doing so, these are the ideas that I believe will be most helpful in my essay.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Final Project: The Scarlet Letter

For the final essay, I have chosen to complete option 1.  I chose option 1 mainly because it seems, not necessarily easier, but more structured and familiar, especially after doing essay 3 on Frankenstein. 
I chose The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne as my primary text.  I had originally planned to do Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen, but before I could get started with reading it the idea of using The Scarlet Letter occurred to me.  It is a book that I had vague recollections of reading in high school and remember it being an enjoyable book and one with plenty of symbolism and themes throughout.
            After reading it again, I have not been disappointed.  There are many themes in the book.  Law and criminality, religion, and hypocrisy are a few.   I have been compelled by the themes of human nature and inward and outward manifestations of  it for most of this semester and it doesn’t seem to be any different for this paper.  As I read the book, the thing that grabbed me repeatedly was the theme of secrets and guilt and how different ways of handling these things can manifest in outward ways and affect the course of one’s life.  As of right now, I hope to illustrate how this is a story that demonstrates the destructive forces of secrets and guilt.
            For my research, I have several books that are compilations of essays on Hawthorne’s work that I checked out from the library. I am only now getting the chance to start flipping through them so I am hoping that I will be able to find the support I need for my idea.  I am also looking at the databases on the library website, mainly LCO and LION.  My search terms have been Hawthorne, Scarlett Letter, secrets, hypocrisy, guilt.  I have not had much luck with the term secrets so I am trying different things and keeping an open mind to different ideas.